Why so coy, Guardian and Observer Weakend?
We all know you pulled your front page splash from the Observer on NSA snooping, after Twitter pointed out that your source, Wayne Madsen, was a grade A nut job.
Today and last night, the apparently real Twitter account @WMRDC posted the following:
The real “fruit loops”: Michael Moynihan, Damian Thompson, “Prof” John Schindler, Louise Mensch, Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs.
Me and Michael Moynihan? Charles Johnson? Damian Thompson? Too kind, sir, too kind.
I then went through and had a little look at Mr. Madsen’s account. Apparently it is real, as it has been posted links to his nutjob website since 2009. I thought I would treat you all to a few of his previously posted tweets, all easy to see on his recent stream and available to the staff of the Guardian and the Observer.
UK sex scandal: It’s Bo Jo and Sam Cam (Mayor of London and PM’s wife). More at http://WayneMadsenReport.com
Was Obama’s mother a secret worshiper of an Indonesian farting dwarf god? Today at http://WayneMadsenReport.com
Evidence that Cheney had Saddam’s chief banker murdered to steal his money. Today at http://WayneMadsenReport.com
Is Obama a member of a secretive sect – the Subud? Today at http://WayneMadsenReport.com
More evidence emerges of Breivik’s links to Israel. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
New 9/11 information points to domestic treason terrorism behind attacks. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Arabic-speaking Mossad teams directed 9/11 “hijacking” cells. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Was Obama’s mother a CIA economic hit woman? Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Murder of GCHQ man fits old British intelligence modus operandi. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Proof: CIA actively recruited at Occidental when Obama was student. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Add Obama’s maternal grandfather to list of CIA family members. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Is Obama a real-life “Manchurian Candidate?” Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
The CIA connections of President Obama’s father. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
The CIA-Mossad-Saudi network that launched Al Qaeda. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Obama’s gay Chicago past linked to murder of Obama’s former church’s choir director. Today at WayneMadsenReport.com
Wow. Personally, I’m really impressed by the Obamas, aren’t you? They’re like the Corleones, but Hawaian. Or like that family in Spy Kids or something. Mother! Father! Grandfather! Son! All CIA agents! Members of the secret Sudud society! And worshippers of the Indonesian Farting God!
You don’t mess with the Indonesian Farting God, boyeee.
Now according to this impeccable source, The Observer actually had their splash on the first editions of the physical paper on Sunday, but unlike them, I would prefer to actually double check it.
Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) who broke the massively important #Snowden story was clearly embarrassed by this epic journalistic FUBAR. He personally had nothing to do with the story, but it is not good enough to say that the Guardian and Observer are separate. They are clearly not separate. The story was front page on the Guardian website, under the Guardian brand; the Guardian must take responsibility.
The Daily Beast also alleges that the writer appears not even to have spoken to Madsen, his “source”, and to have plagiarised a blog called “PrivacySurgeon.org”:
And overlooked by those piling on The Observer was the rather significant fact that the paper appears not to have spoken to Madsen, instead mining quotes from an interview he gave to a blog called PrivacySurgeon.org. (Indeed, some of Doward’s language is very similar to the source material, but why kick a man when he’s down?)
The Guardian’s US Editor responded on Twitter that they had removed the story, to which Harry Cole provided the perfect riposte:
@janinegibson: Observerstory, taken down while editors look at it.” <- They’re meant to do that before you publish it.
So a few questions remain for that beacon of transparency and of getting other journalists locked up, the Guardian:
1. Did your reporter plagiarise his Madsen quotes, and/or language, from a blog as suggested by the Daily Beast?
2. Did your reporter even speak to Wayne Madsen?
3. Did your reporter google or search the Twitter feed of Madsen and if not, why not?
4. Why are you pretending that the Guardian and the Observer are separate when they have the same editor and the story was front page on the Guardian website?
5. If they are separate, why was it @JanineGibson, Twit Bio “Editor in Chief, Guardian US” who responded and pulled the story?
6. Why did “editors look at” a front page story only after the Internet had Fisked it? What is the Guardian/Observer’s practice in terms of editorial checking on major stories? If such a giant story was run on the front page with zero checks or controls, how can readers have any confidence you check any of your stories?
7. Did the story make the printed first edition of the Observer?
Comment is Free was good enough to ask to reprint my blog on privilege-checking; I double dog dare them to reprint this one, and let their own readership hold them to account on “journalism” that goes beyond mere shoddiness to allegations of quote-mining.
Lastly, what are the consequences at the paper for running stories sourced like this?